Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 13:00

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What is a challenge you never want to face?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Russia can stop this any time.
'Lilo & Stitch' and 'Hawaii Five-O' actor David Hekili Kenui Bell dies at 57 - Entertainment Weekly
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What’s next?
Thank you.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What are the key trends in AI search platforms?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
New paper pushes back on Apple’s LLM ‘reasoning collapse’ study - 9to5Mac
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Is it okay if I sleep with my brother without my husband knowing?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
This Vitamin May Lower Your Stroke Risk by 17%, New Study Says - EatingWell
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Pokémon developer Game Freak reveals Beast of Reincarnation at Xbox Games Showcase - Eurogamer